cheating forgery law legal cases Secrets
cheating forgery law legal cases Secrets
Blog Article
77 . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 with the Constitution based over the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued on the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement while in the FIR lodged by FIA and in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
ninety three . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming on the main case, It is additionally a very well-set up proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is subject into the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings to the evidence.
Capital Punishment: Section 302 PPC offers with the death penalty given that the primary form of punishment for intentional murder. The offender might be sentenced to death as retribution for taking the life of another human being unlawfully.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Supplied the legal analysis on the subject issue, we have been of your view that the claim of the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their First contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle is not really legally sound, Aside from promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, These are issue to rules and regulations When the recruitment rules of the subject post allow the case of your petitioners for promotion could possibly be viewed as, however, we've been clear in our point of view that contractual service cannot be regarded as for seniority and promotion because the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health, matter to availability of vacancy matter to your approval on the competent authority.
Preceding 4 tax years interpreted. It's not from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year click here involved. Read more
Article 27 of your Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination for the time of appointment of service but after the appointment in addition. The disparity from the fork out scale allowances of Stenographers during the District Judiciary is while in the crystal clear negation from the law laid down through the Supreme Court in its numerous pronouncements. Read more
If a sufferer is shot at point-blank vary, it might still be fair to infer that the accused meant death. However, that is not really always the case.
Electronic and paper court records retained for the court site might be viewed in the courthouse for free, however there is usually a cost of 10 cents for every page to print from a public access terminal.
P.C. Liability of petitioners with the stated offences would be determined through the learned trial Court after sifting the evidentiary worth in the material produced before the same. Till then, case of
two. I have read the discovered counsel to the parties together with discovered DPG at length, perused the record and observed that:-
Legal Defenses: An accused person charged under Section 302 PPC can present legal defenses like self-defense, insanity, or accidental killing, which could end in reduced charges or acquittal.
Regardless of its popularity, only a few may possibly be familiar with its intricacies. This article is really an attempt to highlight the flaws of this section and the exceptionally reduced threshold that governs it.
When the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC might dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had a chance to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC may possibly allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this will likely be only done In the event the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. During the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence plus the petitioner company responded towards the allegations as a result they were effectively conscious of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use being seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Stacy, a tenant inside of a duplex owned by Martin, filed a civil lawsuit against her landlord, claiming he experienced not specified her more than enough notice before raising her rent, citing a whole new state regulation that needs a minimum of 90 days’ notice. Martin argues that The brand new regulation applies only to landlords of large multi-tenant properties.